![Vintage family from england](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_vdr6RGclMVJ--l0VDGHP7QSX0PpqoGMIGZ6hVNRumGqT47t44jureVB-s1UglKFqSZZBo_UvEDtCO-vj-UlZtU9v_bz-q-L9oHt0s-oLQf-1v4WQDwm0FRx0Rs12RF2BsUfpIMIEWMwiAfCwAjNe12cDHmuCDkRsHDiXPiJYsqZUaP3t9i6BeqdcDsBpI6mgIhUIinD_Eqr8kKC6qKi1Pzhg=s0-d)
We’ve discussed
pay equity and
maternal profiling on this blog. But this
June 11 posting by
Womenstake brings the two together, highlighting a
study that shows mothers were far less likely to be hired than non-mothers, and earned about $11,000 less than non-mothers. Fathers, meanwhile, were judged to be more committed than non-fathers -
a study in 2000 even showed that fathers received a “wage premium” in comparison to non-fathers.
The fathers in our lives should be honored, especially in this week leading up to Father’s Day. But let’s not confuse honoring one parent by discriminating against another.
Comments
Post a Comment